The CSGU: A measure of controllability, stability, globality, and universality attributions

Authors: Coffee, P., Rees, T.

Journal: Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology

Publication Date: 01/01/2008

Volume: 30

Issue: 5

Pages: 611-641

eISSN: 1543-2904

ISSN: 0895-2779

DOI: 10.1123/jsep.30.5.611

Abstract:

This article reports initial evidence of construct validity for a four-factor measure of attributions assessing the dimensions of controllability, stability, globality, and universality (the CSGU). In Study 1, using confirmatory factor analysis, factors were confirmed across least successful and most successful conditions. In Study 2, following less successful performances, correlations supported hypothesized relationships between subscales of the CSGU and subscales of the CDSII (McAuley, Duncan, & Russell, 1992). In Study 3, following less successful performances, moderated hierarchical regression analyses demonstrated that individuals have higher subsequent self-efficacy when they perceive causes of performance as controllable, and/or specific, and/or universal. An interaction for controllability and stability demonstrated that, if causes are perceived as likely to recur, it is important to perceive that causes are controllable. Researchers are encouraged to use the CSGU to examine main and interactive effects of controllability and generalizability attributions upon outcomes such as self-efficacy, emotions, and performance. © 2008 Human Kinetics, Inc.

Source: Scopus

The CSGU: a measure of controllability, stability, globality, and universality attributions.

Authors: Coffee, P., Rees, T.

Journal: J Sport Exerc Psychol

Publication Date: 10/2008

Volume: 30

Issue: 5

Pages: 611-641

ISSN: 0895-2779

DOI: 10.1123/jsep.30.5.611

Abstract:

This article reports initial evidence of construct validity for a four-factor measure of attributions assessing the dimensions of controllability, stability, globality, and universality (the CSGU). In Study 1, using confirmatory factor analysis, factors were confirmed across least successful and most successful conditions. In Study 2, following less successful performances, correlations supported hypothesized relationships between subscales of the CSGU and subscales of the CDSII (McAuley, Duncan, & Russell, 1992). In Study 3, following less successful performances, moderated hierarchical regression analyses demonstrated that individuals have higher subsequent self-efficacy when they perceive causes of performance as controllable, and/or specific, and/or universal. An interaction for controllability and stability demonstrated that if causes are perceived as likely to recur, it is important to perceive that causes are controllable. Researchers are encouraged to use the CSGU to examine main and interactive effects of controllability and generalizability attributions upon outcomes such as self-efficacy, emotions, and performance.

Source: PubMed

The CSGU: A Measure of Controllability, Stability, Globality, and Universality Attributions

Authors: Coffee, P., Rees, T.

Journal: JOURNAL OF SPORT & EXERCISE PSYCHOLOGY

Publication Date: 10/2008

Volume: 30

Issue: 5

Pages: 611-641

eISSN: 1543-2904

ISSN: 0895-2779

DOI: 10.1123/jsep.30.5.611

Source: Web of Science

The CSGU: a measure of controllability, stability, globality, and universality attributions.

Authors: Coffee, P., Rees, T.

Journal: Journal of sport & exercise psychology

Publication Date: 10/2008

Volume: 30

Issue: 5

Pages: 611-641

eISSN: 1543-2904

ISSN: 0895-2779

DOI: 10.1123/jsep.30.5.611

Abstract:

This article reports initial evidence of construct validity for a four-factor measure of attributions assessing the dimensions of controllability, stability, globality, and universality (the CSGU). In Study 1, using confirmatory factor analysis, factors were confirmed across least successful and most successful conditions. In Study 2, following less successful performances, correlations supported hypothesized relationships between subscales of the CSGU and subscales of the CDSII (McAuley, Duncan, & Russell, 1992). In Study 3, following less successful performances, moderated hierarchical regression analyses demonstrated that individuals have higher subsequent self-efficacy when they perceive causes of performance as controllable, and/or specific, and/or universal. An interaction for controllability and stability demonstrated that if causes are perceived as likely to recur, it is important to perceive that causes are controllable. Researchers are encouraged to use the CSGU to examine main and interactive effects of controllability and generalizability attributions upon outcomes such as self-efficacy, emotions, and performance.

Source: Europe PubMed Central