Item-specific proactive interference in olfactory working memory
Authors: Moss, A., Miles, C., Elsley, J., Johnson, A.
Journal: Memory
Publication Date: 21/04/2018
Volume: 26
Issue: 4
Pages: 468-482
eISSN: 1464-0686
ISSN: 0965-8211
DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1369546
Abstract:We examine item-specific olfactory proactive interference (PI) effects and undertake comparisons with verbal and non-verbal visual stimuli. Using a sequential recent-probes task, we show no evidence for PI with hard-to-name odours (Experiment 1). However, verbalisable odours do exhibit PI effects (Experiment 2). These findings occur despite above chance performance and similar serial position functions across both tasks. Experiments 3 and 4 apply words and faces, respectively, to our modified procedure, and show that methodological differences cannot explain the null finding in Experiment 1. The extent to which odours exhibit analogous PI effects to that of other modalities is, we argue, contingent on the characteristics of the odours employed.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/29719/
Source: Scopus
Item-specific proactive interference in olfactory working memory.
Authors: Moss, A., Miles, C., Elsley, J., Johnson, A.
Journal: Memory
Publication Date: 04/2018
Volume: 26
Issue: 4
Pages: 468-482
eISSN: 1464-0686
DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1369546
Abstract:We examine item-specific olfactory proactive interference (PI) effects and undertake comparisons with verbal and non-verbal visual stimuli. Using a sequential recent-probes task, we show no evidence for PI with hard-to-name odours (Experiment 1). However, verbalisable odours do exhibit PI effects (Experiment 2). These findings occur despite above chance performance and similar serial position functions across both tasks. Experiments 3 and 4 apply words and faces, respectively, to our modified procedure, and show that methodological differences cannot explain the null finding in Experiment 1. The extent to which odours exhibit analogous PI effects to that of other modalities is, we argue, contingent on the characteristics of the odours employed.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/29719/
Source: PubMed
Item-specific proactive interference in olfactory working memory
Authors: Moss, A., Miles, C., Elsley, J., Johnson, A.
Journal: MEMORY
Publication Date: 2018
Volume: 26
Issue: 4
Pages: 468-482
eISSN: 1464-0686
ISSN: 0965-8211
DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1369546
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/29719/
Source: Web of Science
Item-specific proactive interference in olfactory working memory
Authors: Moss, A., Miles, C., Elsley, Johnson, A.
Journal: Memory
Publication Date: 08/02/2018
Volume: 26
Issue: 4
Pages: 468-482
Publisher: Psychology Press
ISSN: 0965-8211
DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1369546
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/29719/
Source: Manual
Item-specific proactive interference in olfactory working memory.
Authors: Moss, A., Miles, C., Elsley, J., Johnson, A.
Journal: Memory (Hove, England)
Publication Date: 04/2018
Volume: 26
Issue: 4
Pages: 468-482
eISSN: 1464-0686
ISSN: 0965-8211
DOI: 10.1080/09658211.2017.1369546
Abstract:We examine item-specific olfactory proactive interference (PI) effects and undertake comparisons with verbal and non-verbal visual stimuli. Using a sequential recent-probes task, we show no evidence for PI with hard-to-name odours (Experiment 1). However, verbalisable odours do exhibit PI effects (Experiment 2). These findings occur despite above chance performance and similar serial position functions across both tasks. Experiments 3 and 4 apply words and faces, respectively, to our modified procedure, and show that methodological differences cannot explain the null finding in Experiment 1. The extent to which odours exhibit analogous PI effects to that of other modalities is, we argue, contingent on the characteristics of the odours employed.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/29719/
Source: Europe PubMed Central