Whose models? Which representations? A response to Wagner
Authors: Hardman, D., Hutchinson, P.
Journal: Journal of Medical Ethics
Publication Date: 01/12/2023
Volume: 49
Issue: 12
Pages: 850-851
eISSN: 1473-4257
ISSN: 0306-6800
DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-108958
Abstract:In Where the Ethical Action Is, we argued that medical and ethical modes of thought are not different in kind but different aspects of a situation. One of the consequences of this argument is that the requirement for or benefits of normative moral theorising in bioethics is undercut. In response, Wagner has argued that normative moral theories should be reconceived as models. Wagner’s argument seems to be that once reconceived as models, the rationale for moral theorising, undercut by our arguments in Where the Ethical Action Is, will be re-established because we will see those moral-theories-now-rebranded-as-models as serving a role akin to the role models serve in some of the natural sciences. In this response to Wagner, we provide two arguments against Wagner’s proposal. We call these arguments the Turner-Cicourel Challenge and the Question Begging Challenge.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/38492/
Source: Scopus
Whose models? Which representations? A response to Wagner.
Authors: Hardman, D., Hutchinson, P.
Journal: J Med Ethics
Publication Date: 23/11/2023
Volume: 49
Issue: 12
Pages: 850-851
eISSN: 1473-4257
DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-108958
Abstract:In Where the Ethical Action Is, we argued that medical and ethical modes of thought are not different in kind but different aspects of a situation. One of the consequences of this argument is that the requirement for or benefits of normative moral theorising in bioethics is undercut. In response, Wagner has argued that normative moral theories should be reconceived as models. Wagner's argument seems to be that once reconceived as models, the rationale for moral theorising, undercut by our arguments in Where the Ethical Action Is, will be re-established because we will see those moral-theories-now-rebranded-as-models as serving a role akin to the role models serve in some of the natural sciences. In this response to Wagner, we provide two arguments against Wagner's proposal. We call these arguments the Turner-Cicourel Challenge and the Question Begging Challenge.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/38492/
Source: PubMed
Whose models? Which representations? A response to Wagner
Authors: Hardman, D., Hutchinson, P.
Journal: JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
Publication Date: 12/2023
Volume: 49
Issue: 12
Pages: 850-851
eISSN: 1473-4257
ISSN: 0306-6800
DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-108958
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/38492/
Source: Web of Science
Whose models? Which representations? A response to Wagner
Authors: Hardman, D., Hutchinson, P.
Journal: Journal of Medical Ethics
Publication Date: 26/04/2023
Publisher: BMJ
ISSN: 0306-6800
DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-108958
Abstract:In Where the Ethical Action Is, we argued that medical and ethical modes of thought are not different in kind but different aspects of a situation. One of the consequences of this argument is that the requirement for or benefits of normative moral theorising in bioethics is undercut. In response, Wagner has argued that normative moral theories should be reconceived as models. Wagner’s argument seems to be that once reconceived as models, the rationale for moral theorising, undercut by our arguments in Where the Ethical Action Is, will be re-established because we will see those moral-theories-now-rebranded-as-models as serving a role akin to the role models serve in some of the natural sciences. In this response to Wagner, we provide two arguments against Wagner’s proposal. We call these arguments the Turner-Cicourel Challenge and the Question Begging Challenge.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/38492/
Source: Manual
Preferred by: Doug Hardman
Whose models? Which representations? A response to Wagner.
Authors: Hardman, D., Hutchinson, P.
Journal: Journal of medical ethics
Publication Date: 11/2023
Volume: 49
Issue: 12
Pages: 850-851
eISSN: 1473-4257
ISSN: 0306-6800
DOI: 10.1136/jme-2023-108958
Abstract:In Where the Ethical Action Is, we argued that medical and ethical modes of thought are not different in kind but different aspects of a situation. One of the consequences of this argument is that the requirement for or benefits of normative moral theorising in bioethics is undercut. In response, Wagner has argued that normative moral theories should be reconceived as models. Wagner's argument seems to be that once reconceived as models, the rationale for moral theorising, undercut by our arguments in Where the Ethical Action Is, will be re-established because we will see those moral-theories-now-rebranded-as-models as serving a role akin to the role models serve in some of the natural sciences. In this response to Wagner, we provide two arguments against Wagner's proposal. We call these arguments the Turner-Cicourel Challenge and the Question Begging Challenge.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/38492/
Source: Europe PubMed Central