Limb specific training magnitude and asymmetry measurement to discriminate between athletes with and without unilateral or bilateral lower limb injury history
Authors: Wylde, M.J., Callaway, A.J., Williams, J.M., Yap, J., Leow, S., Yong, L.C.
Journal: Physical Therapy in Sport
Publication Date: 01/07/2022
Volume: 56
Pages: 76-83
eISSN: 1873-1600
ISSN: 1466-853X
DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2022.05.008
Abstract:Objectives: This study investigates the use of tibia-mounted inertial measurement units (IMUs) as an alternative to upper trunk-mounted IMUs for assessing lower limb training magnitudes and asymmetries in Badminton players. Design: Cross-Sectional Study. Setting: Youth athlete training environment. Participants: Thirty-three adolescent Badminton players, grouped based on injury history (non-injured = 19, bilateral = 6, unilateral = 8). Main outcome measures: Players wore 1 upper trunk-mounted and 2 tibia-mounted IMUs during simulated match-play. Modified vector magnitudes were assessed to identify if the IMUs can discriminate between injury history groups to assess the device location sensitivity, determine to what extent players exhibit movement asymmetry within the sport, and explore if asymmetries exist within groups with injury history. Results: Upper trunk-mounted IMUs could not distinguish between injury history groups. Statistically significant asymmetries were observed in the non-injured group, however these were below the 10% threshold for clinical asymmetry. No significant asymmetries were observed in the bilaterally injured group, while statistically significant asymmetries were observed in the unilaterally injured group, which were above the 10% threshold for clinical asymmetry. Conclusion: These results suggest that direct limb specific IMU measurement offers a method to suitably assess training magnitudes and asymmetry within a sporting performance, rather than isolated non-sport specific testing.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/37065/
Source: Scopus
Limb specific training magnitude and asymmetry measurement to discriminate between athletes with and without unilateral or bilateral lower limb injury history.
Authors: Wylde, M.J., Callaway, A.J., Williams, J.M., Yap, J., Leow, S., Yong, L.C.
Journal: Phys Ther Sport
Publication Date: 07/2022
Volume: 56
Pages: 76-83
eISSN: 1873-1600
DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2022.05.008
Abstract:OBJECTIVES: This study investigates the use of tibia-mounted inertial measurement units (IMUs) as an alternative to upper trunk-mounted IMUs for assessing lower limb training magnitudes and asymmetries in Badminton players. DESIGN: Cross-Sectional Study. SETTING: Youth athlete training environment. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-three adolescent Badminton players, grouped based on injury history (non-injured = 19, bilateral = 6, unilateral = 8). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Players wore 1 upper trunk-mounted and 2 tibia-mounted IMUs during simulated match-play. Modified vector magnitudes were assessed to identify if the IMUs can discriminate between injury history groups to assess the device location sensitivity, determine to what extent players exhibit movement asymmetry within the sport, and explore if asymmetries exist within groups with injury history. RESULTS: Upper trunk-mounted IMUs could not distinguish between injury history groups. Statistically significant asymmetries were observed in the non-injured group, however these were below the 10% threshold for clinical asymmetry. No significant asymmetries were observed in the bilaterally injured group, while statistically significant asymmetries were observed in the unilaterally injured group, which were above the 10% threshold for clinical asymmetry. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that direct limb specific IMU measurement offers a method to suitably assess training magnitudes and asymmetry within a sporting performance, rather than isolated non-sport specific testing.
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/37065/
Source: PubMed
Limb specific training magnitude and asymmetry measurement to discriminate between athletes with and without unilateral or bilateral lower limb injury history
Authors: Wylde, M.J., Callaway, A.J., Williams, J.M., Yap, J., Leow, S., Yong, L.C.
Journal: PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT
Publication Date: 07/2022
Volume: 56
Pages: 76-83
ISSN: 1466-853X
DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2022.05.008
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/37065/
Source: Web of Science
Limb specific training magnitude and asymmetry measurement to discriminate between athletes with and without unilateral or bilateral lower limb injury history
Authors: Wylde, M.J., Callaway, A.J., Williams, J.M., Yap, J., Leow, S., Yong, L.C.
Journal: PHYSICAL THERAPY IN SPORT
Publication Date: 2022
Volume: 56
Pages: 76-83
ISSN: 1466-853X
DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2022.05.008
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/37065/
Source: Web of Science
Limb specific training magnitude and asymmetry measurement to discriminate between athletes with and without unilateral or bilateral lower limb injury history
Authors: Wylde, M., Callaway, A., Williams, J., Yap, J., Leow, S., CheeYong, L.
Journal: Physical Therapy in Sport
Publication Date: 21/06/2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2022.05.008
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/37065/
Source: Manual
Limb specific training magnitude and asymmetry measurement to discriminate between athletes with and without unilateral or bilateral lower limb injury history
Authors: Wylde, M.J., Callaway, A., Williams, J., Yap, J., Leow, S., Chee Young, L.
Journal: Physical Therapy in Sport
Publication Date: 21/05/2022
Volume: 56
Pages: 76-83
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 1466-853X
DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2022.05.008
https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/37065/
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ptsp.2022.05.008
Source: Manual
Limb specific training magnitude and asymmetry measurement to discriminate between athletes with and without unilateral or bilateral lower limb injury history.
Authors: Wylde, M.J., Callaway, A.J., Williams, J.M., Yap, J., Leow, S., Yong, L.C.
Journal: Physical therapy in sport : official journal of the Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Sports Medicine
Publication Date: 07/2022
Volume: 56
Pages: 76-83
eISSN: 1873-1600
ISSN: 1466-853X
DOI: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2022.05.008
Abstract:Objectives
This study investigates the use of tibia-mounted inertial measurement units (IMUs) as an alternative to upper trunk-mounted IMUs for assessing lower limb training magnitudes and asymmetries in Badminton players.Design
Cross-Sectional Study.Setting
Youth athlete training environment.Participants
Thirty-three adolescent Badminton players, grouped based on injury history (non-injured = 19, bilateral = 6, unilateral = 8).Main outcome measures
Players wore 1 upper trunk-mounted and 2 tibia-mounted IMUs during simulated match-play. Modified vector magnitudes were assessed to identify if the IMUs can discriminate between injury history groups to assess the device location sensitivity, determine to what extent players exhibit movement asymmetry within the sport, and explore if asymmetries exist within groups with injury history.Results
Upper trunk-mounted IMUs could not distinguish between injury history groups. Statistically significant asymmetries were observed in the non-injured group, however these were below the 10% threshold for clinical asymmetry. No significant asymmetries were observed in the bilaterally injured group, while statistically significant asymmetries were observed in the unilaterally injured group, which were above the 10% threshold for clinical asymmetry.Conclusion
These results suggest that direct limb specific IMU measurement offers a method to suitably assess training magnitudes and asymmetry within a sporting performance, rather than isolated non-sport specific testing.https://eprints.bournemouth.ac.uk/37065/
Source: Europe PubMed Central