Tinbergen's "four questions" provides a formal framework for a more complete understanding of prosocial biases in favour of attractive people
Authors: Stephen, I.D., Burke, D., Sulikowski, D.
Journal: Behavioral and Brain Sciences
Volume: 40
eISSN: 1469-1825
ISSN: 0140-525X
DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X16000650
Abstract:We adopt Tinbergen's (1963) "four questions" approach to strengthen the criticism by Maestripieri et al. of the non-evolutionary accounts of favouritism toward attractive individuals, by showing which levels of explanation are lacking in these accounts. We also use this approach to propose ways in which the evolutionary account may be extended and strengthened.
Source: Scopus
Tinbergen's "four questions" provides a formal framework for a more complete understanding of prosocial biases in favour of attractive people.
Authors: Stephen, I.D., Burke, D., Sulikowski, D.
Journal: Behav Brain Sci
Volume: 40
eISSN: 1469-1825
DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X16000650
Abstract:We adopt Tinbergen's (1963) "four questions" approach to strengthen the criticism by Maestripieri et al. of the non-evolutionary accounts of favouritism toward attractive individuals, by showing which levels of explanation are lacking in these accounts. We also use this approach to propose ways in which the evolutionary account may be extended and strengthened.
Source: PubMed
Tinbergen's "four questions" provides a formal framework for a more complete understanding of prosocial biases in favour of attractive people
Authors: Stephen, I.D., Burke, D., Sulikowski, D.
Journal: BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES
Volume: 40
eISSN: 1469-1825
ISSN: 0140-525X
DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X16000650
Source: Web of Science
Tinbergen's "four questions" provides a formal framework for a more complete understanding of prosocial biases in favour of attractive people.
Authors: Stephen, I.D., Burke, D., Sulikowski, D.
Journal: The Behavioral and brain sciences
Volume: 40
eISSN: 1469-1825
ISSN: 0140-525X
DOI: 10.1017/s0140525x16000650
Abstract:We adopt Tinbergen's (1963) "four questions" approach to strengthen the criticism by Maestripieri et al. of the non-evolutionary accounts of favouritism toward attractive individuals, by showing which levels of explanation are lacking in these accounts. We also use this approach to propose ways in which the evolutionary account may be extended and strengthened.
Source: Europe PubMed Central